Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-28 09:00:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 533D3B9392192EBC7702DC3AFB09AE46C6FDECE42B35FAD9289C8AA35466A87C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter's claim that the ban is temporary is disproven by the correspondence Ken Klippenstein shared on his substack. Twitter advised Ken his account was not temporarily suspended but rather permanently banned. https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/my-twitter-ban-is-political?r=bwh5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839728939125583884
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 533D3B9392192EBC7702DC3AFB09AE46C6FDECE42B35FAD9289C8AA35466A87C
  • createdAtMillis - 1727514019098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839728939125583884533D3B9392192EBC7702DC3AFB09AE46C6FDECE42B35FAD9289C8AA35466A87C