Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 20:12:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B0E83897DF559C1430E3B46934F93EC0A0119B828D9160D95E078295727904E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter's claim that the ban is temporary is disproven by the correspondence Ken Klippenstein shared on his substack. Twitter advised Ken his account was not temporarily suspended but rather permanently banned. https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/my-twitter-ban-is-political?r=bwh5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839728939125583884
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B0E83897DF559C1430E3B46934F93EC0A0119B828D9160D95E078295727904E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727467946516
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18397289391255838840B0E83897DF559C1430E3B46934F93EC0A0119B828D9160D95E078295727904E