Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 17:52:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9AB07720052C2A2E26F55F6B439B1B7AB6AF712AAE63FB477D84ED799B7D13E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hon. Sudi uses an appeal to emotion fallacy by trying to provoke outrage without presenting any factual evidence, encouraging readers to react emotionally rather than critically. Readers should be cautious on emotionally charged statements that attempt to manipulate opinions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839669801511243966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9AB07720052C2A2E26F55F6B439B1B7AB6AF712AAE63FB477D84ED799B7D13E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727459554741
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839669801511243966C9AB07720052C2A2E26F55F6B439B1B7AB6AF712AAE63FB477D84ED799B7D13E