Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 16:11:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39B2A4A7000D359338E22567EA7E58500F4CD63BAF26545E3FD6BB50330CEFD3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hon. Sudi uses an appeal to emotion fallacy by trying to provoke outrage without presenting any factual evidence, encouraging readers to react emotionally rather than critically. Readers should be cautious on emotionally charged statements that attempt to manipulate opinions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839669801511243966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39B2A4A7000D359338E22567EA7E58500F4CD63BAF26545E3FD6BB50330CEFD3
  • createdAtMillis - 1727453496163
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183966980151124396639B2A4A7000D359338E22567EA7E58500F4CD63BAF26545E3FD6BB50330CEFD3