Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-28 04:13:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25C253A1E0370D8414D0B4AFC11C0A785696A548EACF0BF6DEAE0AF9EA816C0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hon. Sudi uses an appeal to emotion fallacy by trying to provoke outrage without presenting any factual evidence, encouraging readers to react emotionally rather than critically. Readers should be cautious on emotionally charged statements that attempt to manipulate opinions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839669801511243966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25C253A1E0370D8414D0B4AFC11C0A785696A548EACF0BF6DEAE0AF9EA816C0D
  • createdAtMillis - 1727496837054
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183966980151124396625C253A1E0370D8414D0B4AFC11C0A785696A548EACF0BF6DEAE0AF9EA816C0D