Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-28 02:28:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 94FFEBB8BF8809C25049C2323752B1A234DEA108F5E3DDD559049A9EA25EE6D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, die vorgeschlagene Notiz ist argumentativ und unnötig. Es gibt verschiedene Rechtsauffassungen ob der Herr Treutler eine Geschäftsordnungsdebatte hätte verhindern dürfen und das entscheidet nun der Verfassungsgerichtshof https://www.zeit.de/politik/2024-09/thueringen-verfassungsgericht-parlament-afd-alterspraesident

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839645757420306730
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 94FFEBB8BF8809C25049C2323752B1A234DEA108F5E3DDD559049A9EA25EE6D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1727490526185
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183964575742030673094FFEBB8BF8809C25049C2323752B1A234DEA108F5E3DDD559049A9EA25EE6D6