Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-28 13:58:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C89A7E2F89FD6F2E350B7F94B72C424424AFD45020F0F00EDE3DA5951F65DB51
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note accuses the source of using counting rules which, in the note author's view, are "highly misleading." We could as well ask for a comparison of the tonnage of munitions or other aspects of the exchanges. The post makes no misleading claim about what "82%" represents.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839602892354818101
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C89A7E2F89FD6F2E350B7F94B72C424424AFD45020F0F00EDE3DA5951F65DB51
  • createdAtMillis - 1727531932106
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839602892354818101C89A7E2F89FD6F2E350B7F94B72C424424AFD45020F0F00EDE3DA5951F65DB51