Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 18:08:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7AC240CEC587B8FA19D41409A641187B240F3D47ED50F6C0A59B5E6D76AA18DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note accuses the source of using counting rules which, in the note author's view, are "highly misleading." We could as well ask for a comparison of the tonnage of munitions or other aspects of the exchanges. The post makes no misleading claim about what "82%" represents.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839602892354818101
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7AC240CEC587B8FA19D41409A641187B240F3D47ED50F6C0A59B5E6D76AA18DF
  • createdAtMillis - 1727460514440
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18396028923548181017AC240CEC587B8FA19D41409A641187B240F3D47ED50F6C0A59B5E6D76AA18DF