Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-28 04:25:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die juristische Bewertung steht noch aus, ob es einem Alterspräsidenten gestattet ist, Anträge abzulehnen. https://verfassungsgerichtshof.thueringen.de/aktuelles/presseinformationen/detailseiten?tx_news_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail&tx_news_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=News&tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=4801&cHash=6ed445d0ef172e54eb4510ebd3ffc0c1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1839600694761841103
participantId -
raterParticipantId - FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3
createdAtMillis - 1727497522404
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1839600694761841103FF0D2C60D46674BDCF1043D1F1E729D0915B049E4E31099928A07FF9788B5AE3