Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 15:56:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA9D251E8A30BF10A03348CC1E2CD8D4B00D8002C530C092B9D057D113CC3664
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die juristische Bewertung steht noch aus, ob es einem Alterspräsidenten gestattet ist, Anträge abzulehnen. https://verfassungsgerichtshof.thueringen.de/aktuelles/presseinformationen/detailseiten?tx_news_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail&tx_news_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=News&tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=4801&cHash=6ed445d0ef172e54eb4510ebd3ffc0c1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839600694761841103
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA9D251E8A30BF10A03348CC1E2CD8D4B00D8002C530C092B9D057D113CC3664
  • createdAtMillis - 1727452588050
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839600694761841103CA9D251E8A30BF10A03348CC1E2CD8D4B00D8002C530C092B9D057D113CC3664