Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 07:57:08 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C667487E7744800B27485C6331B5361CFF983897F85FA9B7C49EC56297589239
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die juristische Bewertung steht noch aus, ob es einem Alterspräsidenten gestattet ist, Anträge abzulehnen. https://verfassungsgerichtshof.thueringen.de/aktuelles/presseinformationen/detailseiten?tx_news_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail&tx_news_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=News&tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=4801&cHash=6ed445d0ef172e54eb4510ebd3ffc0c1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1839600694761841103
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C667487E7744800B27485C6331B5361CFF983897F85FA9B7C49EC56297589239
createdAtMillis - 1727596628065
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1839600694761841103C667487E7744800B27485C6331B5361CFF983897F85FA9B7C49EC56297589239