Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 02:56:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6957FFEF3FE7C21F7928FDD6D6683A55E0D4F05D629CB107A3BB78F8FF4A3F5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note provides no positive proof that the post is inaccurate. Opinions about tone and speculation about the status of the employees can be kept to the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839478820610469994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6957FFEF3FE7C21F7928FDD6D6683A55E0D4F05D629CB107A3BB78F8FF4A3F5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727405783192
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18394788206104699946957FFEF3FE7C21F7928FDD6D6683A55E0D4F05D629CB107A3BB78F8FF4A3F5E