Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 23:45:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D595C22F711402407BE6F9B2E1257C0D3DB6570EDF36268EC904212D7EBFC8EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There is at least some evidence that the prosecutions are “illicit” (see the thread itself for this), and the point of this lawsuit is that the DOJ refuses to turn over evidence that could substantiate or refute the illicitness of the prosecutions (again see the thread).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839465061477130250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D595C22F711402407BE6F9B2E1257C0D3DB6570EDF36268EC904212D7EBFC8EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1727480749731
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839465061477130250D595C22F711402407BE6F9B2E1257C0D3DB6570EDF36268EC904212D7EBFC8EE