Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 15:35:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D32A84E8F59B125142CE90C9A0816F9DF1E5218D3CBD34AD4DD893B1E03DFE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There is at least some evidence that the prosecutions are “illicit” (see the thread itself for this), and the point of this lawsuit is that the DOJ refuses to turn over evidence that could substantiate or refute the illicitness of the prosecutions (again see the thread).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839465061477130250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6D32A84E8F59B125142CE90C9A0816F9DF1E5218D3CBD34AD4DD893B1E03DFE7
  • createdAtMillis - 1727451300948
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18394650614771302506D32A84E8F59B125142CE90C9A0816F9DF1E5218D3CBD34AD4DD893B1E03DFE7