Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 06:34:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69C9DE1CC81707FDD925EA4F4EEB042F853492781DB65E9E3054E71D0D53FE71
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There is at least some evidence that the prosecutions are “illicit” (see the thread itself for this), and the point of this lawsuit is that the DOJ refuses to turn over evidence that could substantiate or refute the illicitness of the prosecutions (again see the thread).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839465061477130250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69C9DE1CC81707FDD925EA4F4EEB042F853492781DB65E9E3054E71D0D53FE71
  • createdAtMillis - 1727418869442
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183946506147713025069C9DE1CC81707FDD925EA4F4EEB042F853492781DB65E9E3054E71D0D53FE71