Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 18:58:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F57E031188C935DC4074E417E50B79979E6AB6FCD09413F7B48C6B65749127C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There is at least some evidence that the prosecutions are “illicit” (see the thread itself for this), and the point of this lawsuit is that the DOJ refuses to turn over evidence that could substantiate or refute the illicitness of the prosecutions (again see the thread).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839465061477130250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F57E031188C935DC4074E417E50B79979E6AB6FCD09413F7B48C6B65749127C
  • createdAtMillis - 1727463514650
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18394650614771302505F57E031188C935DC4074E417E50B79979E6AB6FCD09413F7B48C6B65749127C