Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 03:51:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10BF5AEB695035C151D883B6A2FAFF6F82D982DACE53BAAA995D3BF7A1801E8D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There is at least some evidence that the prosecutions are “illicit” (see the thread itself for this), and the point of this lawsuit is that the DOJ refuses to turn over evidence that could substantiate or refute the illicitness of the prosecutions (again see the thread).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839465061477130250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10BF5AEB695035C151D883B6A2FAFF6F82D982DACE53BAAA995D3BF7A1801E8D
  • createdAtMillis - 1727409091473
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183946506147713025010BF5AEB695035C151D883B6A2FAFF6F82D982DACE53BAAA995D3BF7A1801E8D