Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 18:53:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC4E6090A0843C92BB9E8FBB727BF3A8E692BFB75FF539203FF81FC14907F8C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080131111653.htm Link is self explanatory

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839376112603873305
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CC4E6090A0843C92BB9E8FBB727BF3A8E692BFB75FF539203FF81FC14907F8C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1727376810796
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1839376112603873305CC4E6090A0843C92BB9E8FBB727BF3A8E692BFB75FF539203FF81FC14907F8C4