Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 21:18:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C91789250C693FB0B154520BB12C67D18C7FEA7275AF66806FEDF0894AE60B41
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080131111653.htm Link is self explanatory

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839376112603873305
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C91789250C693FB0B154520BB12C67D18C7FEA7275AF66806FEDF0894AE60B41
  • createdAtMillis - 1727385525245
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839376112603873305C91789250C693FB0B154520BB12C67D18C7FEA7275AF66806FEDF0894AE60B41