Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 07:23:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29FE4DF184E58AEED9D23335EF8BDCE00F19C1BE95AB95215434EF631ABDCD81
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080131111653.htm Link is self explanatory

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839376112603873305
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29FE4DF184E58AEED9D23335EF8BDCE00F19C1BE95AB95215434EF631ABDCD81
  • createdAtMillis - 1727421790197
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183937611260387330529FE4DF184E58AEED9D23335EF8BDCE00F19C1BE95AB95215434EF631ABDCD81