Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 07:57:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00E55C8A216BE942B11E23EF658502DC314B42372348AB349930F90290585C53
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080131111653.htm Link is self explanatory

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839376112603873305
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00E55C8A216BE942B11E23EF658502DC314B42372348AB349930F90290585C53
  • createdAtMillis - 1727423875583
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183937611260387330500E55C8A216BE942B11E23EF658502DC314B42372348AB349930F90290585C53