Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 15:19:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83B9040933D1ADCCD26B4021862656E2038FC8268D4FAC676559EA9AE7417AE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Im Gerichtsurteil ging es nicht um Fake News. Gegenstand war eine Zivilklage in der Böhmermann erwirken wollte, dass ein Imker nicht mit Böhmermanns Namen wirbt. Diesen Rechtsstreit hat der Moderator verloren. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/boehmermann-imker-honig-gerichtsentscheidung-100.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1839250774313824275
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 83B9040933D1ADCCD26B4021862656E2038FC8268D4FAC676559EA9AE7417AE0
createdAtMillis - 1727363944013
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 183925077431382427583B9040933D1ADCCD26B4021862656E2038FC8268D4FAC676559EA9AE7417AE0