Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 11:14:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71748410962ABB867DEB0A40EA5B5430C629BFF0AC3387D7E6C7C2552D67554D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Im Gerichtsurteil ging es nicht um Fake News. Gegenstand war eine Zivilklage in der Böhmermann erwirken wollte, dass ein Imker nicht mit Böhmermanns Namen wirbt. Diesen Rechtsstreit hat der Moderator verloren. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/boehmermann-imker-honig-gerichtsentscheidung-100.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1839250774313824275
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 71748410962ABB867DEB0A40EA5B5430C629BFF0AC3387D7E6C7C2552D67554D
createdAtMillis - 1727349281192
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 183925077431382427571748410962ABB867DEB0A40EA5B5430C629BFF0AC3387D7E6C7C2552D67554D