Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-19 11:29:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E36297521F613C07F4D20E7880C88E0342AE788442434F4572DCE0FF729C690
Participant Details

Original Note:

Im Gerichtsurteil ging es nicht um Fake News. Gegenstand war eine Zivilklage in der Böhmermann erwirken wollte, dass ein Imker nicht mit Böhmermanns Namen wirbt. Diesen Rechtsstreit hat der Moderator verloren. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/boehmermann-imker-honig-gerichtsentscheidung-100.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1839250774313824275
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5E36297521F613C07F4D20E7880C88E0342AE788442434F4572DCE0FF729C690
createdAtMillis - 1734607745100
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18392507743138242755E36297521F613C07F4D20E7880C88E0342AE788442434F4572DCE0FF729C690