Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 11:04:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EB98031DA622465D6C9190E21DA7E440BE25500D7798FE66AE534481FA6E8D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Im Gerichtsurteil ging es nicht um Fake News. Gegenstand war eine Zivilklage in der Böhmermann erwirken wollte, dass ein Imker nicht mit Böhmermanns Namen wirbt. Diesen Rechtsstreit hat der Moderator verloren. https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/gesellschaft/boehmermann-imker-honig-gerichtsentscheidung-100.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1839250774313824275
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0EB98031DA622465D6C9190E21DA7E440BE25500D7798FE66AE534481FA6E8D3
createdAtMillis - 1727348666567
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18392507743138242750EB98031DA622465D6C9190E21DA7E440BE25500D7798FE66AE534481FA6E8D3