Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 09:20:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE30528D5DCBD696B08CF94B175DC9C35A3C1BA07806E3F55157FB76532CE62B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Marcel Williams' murder conviction is dubious due to a recanted key witness, inexperienced defense lawyers, and DNA evidence implicating another suspect, ignored during the trial. He lacks a criminal past, and there's no direct evidence linking him to the crime. www.cnn.com/2024/09/24/us/marcellus-williams-scheduled-execution

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839178519818952781
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE30528D5DCBD696B08CF94B175DC9C35A3C1BA07806E3F55157FB76532CE62B
  • createdAtMillis - 1727342428387
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1839178519818952781CE30528D5DCBD696B08CF94B175DC9C35A3C1BA07806E3F55157FB76532CE62B