Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 19:27:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6936B6B7725B9565CA0FE075CB0E75F4C9B873278DF94BBC2BBDC266CBD9176D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Marcel Williams' murder conviction is dubious due to a recanted key witness, inexperienced defense lawyers, and DNA evidence implicating another suspect, ignored during the trial. He lacks a criminal past, and there's no direct evidence linking him to the crime. www.cnn.com/2024/09/24/us/marcellus-williams-scheduled-execution

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839178519818952781
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6936B6B7725B9565CA0FE075CB0E75F4C9B873278DF94BBC2BBDC266CBD9176D
  • createdAtMillis - 1727378831933
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18391785198189527816936B6B7725B9565CA0FE075CB0E75F4C9B873278DF94BBC2BBDC266CBD9176D