Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 16:17:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0945B957E01B4311E634C937335F87EBDA4F4AF0DCC54027E0D93BF7D2DD8B69
Participant Details

Original Note:

Marcel Williams' murder conviction is dubious due to a recanted key witness, inexperienced defense lawyers, and DNA evidence implicating another suspect, ignored during the trial. He lacks a criminal past, and there's no direct evidence linking him to the crime. www.cnn.com/2024/09/24/us/marcellus-williams-scheduled-execution

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1839178519818952781
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0945B957E01B4311E634C937335F87EBDA4F4AF0DCC54027E0D93BF7D2DD8B69
createdAtMillis - 1727367476319
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18391785198189527810945B957E01B4311E634C937335F87EBDA4F4AF0DCC54027E0D93BF7D2DD8B69