Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 05:04:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF322D73D02559ED39A87BDA685207C486EB1FD07CE32880B97EC719005FDDC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

While there’s a lack of DNA evidence, that alone isn’t exculpatory. Williams possessed and sold the victim’s husband’s laptop and had her calculator in his car. Read the case: https://law.justia.com/cases/missouri/supreme-court/2003/sc-83934-1.html The *new* prosecutor conceded there’s no clear and convincing evidence of actual innocence (p.13) https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=211928

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839125336778215425
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF322D73D02559ED39A87BDA685207C486EB1FD07CE32880B97EC719005FDDC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1727327076015
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839125336778215425AF322D73D02559ED39A87BDA685207C486EB1FD07CE32880B97EC719005FDDC2