Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 07:44:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EAEA9DAE575A7B5F08880A855F8AC846063646B8C39A3A55BC5824AF8FF245DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The facts don’t seem to be in dispute. Some commentators wish to justify Sir Keir’s actions in this case. They have every right to do so but in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839057020931936561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EAEA9DAE575A7B5F08880A855F8AC846063646B8C39A3A55BC5824AF8FF245DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1727423044145
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839057020931936561EAEA9DAE575A7B5F08880A855F8AC846063646B8C39A3A55BC5824AF8FF245DB