Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 23:04:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C813065560D9784D8A7CC3E4A583A4E62685F0E0A6B81C6BE7949C4D692E00B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The facts don’t seem to be in dispute. Some commentators wish to justify Sir Keir’s actions in this case. They have every right to do so but in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839057020931936561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C813065560D9784D8A7CC3E4A583A4E62685F0E0A6B81C6BE7949C4D692E00B
  • createdAtMillis - 1727305464215
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18390570209319365618C813065560D9784D8A7CC3E4A583A4E62685F0E0A6B81C6BE7949C4D692E00B