Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 07:13:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5DAEF054C43EE570A1CDF2CB44C234B3A94F254D25A8CA1625BB9FFA243B2489
Participant Details

Original Note:

The facts don’t seem to be in dispute. Some commentators wish to justify Sir Keir’s actions in this case. They have every right to do so but in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839057020931936561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5DAEF054C43EE570A1CDF2CB44C234B3A94F254D25A8CA1625BB9FFA243B2489
  • createdAtMillis - 1727334790393
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18390570209319365615DAEF054C43EE570A1CDF2CB44C234B3A94F254D25A8CA1625BB9FFA243B2489