Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 22:05:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35C54034955CA9ED7A4E44F86451E7A297A64CA6A7660625A79087005F835FE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The facts don’t seem to be in dispute. Some commentators wish to justify Sir Keir’s actions in this case. They have every right to do so but in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839057020931936561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35C54034955CA9ED7A4E44F86451E7A297A64CA6A7660625A79087005F835FE3
  • createdAtMillis - 1727388303442
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183905702093193656135C54034955CA9ED7A4E44F86451E7A297A64CA6A7660625A79087005F835FE3