Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 05:00:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2199134E471987B1ABD6DD7308A1D94B89A5CC28C4780E7F35F9D216F708FC8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The facts don’t seem to be in dispute. Some commentators wish to justify Sir Keir’s actions in this case. They have every right to do so but in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839057020931936561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2199134E471987B1ABD6DD7308A1D94B89A5CC28C4780E7F35F9D216F708FC8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1727326823518
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18390570209319365612199134E471987B1ABD6DD7308A1D94B89A5CC28C4780E7F35F9D216F708FC8C