Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 05:26:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 220DC0551FAAFBE5373752C3EB39B159EC6B1AD2736F24FD1ABA941744EB8652
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN isn’t here to jump in and ask X users for citations. The only source mustered supports the tweet; then demands OP source with better “data”. The onus is on CN users to justify the note. If you take issue with the opinion presented take it to the replies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839019286867882088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 220DC0551FAAFBE5373752C3EB39B159EC6B1AD2736F24FD1ABA941744EB8652
  • createdAtMillis - 1727328377310
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839019286867882088220DC0551FAAFBE5373752C3EB39B159EC6B1AD2736F24FD1ABA941744EB8652