Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 17:56:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EF6E501CAEC2C3B3290FB5F663AC40AEAA22DF3F82A3D311EB45ECB00AB88CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN isn’t here to jump in and ask X users for citations. The only source mustered supports the tweet; then demands OP source with better “data”. The onus is on CN users to justify the note. If you take issue with the opinion presented take it to the replies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839019286867882088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EF6E501CAEC2C3B3290FB5F663AC40AEAA22DF3F82A3D311EB45ECB00AB88CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1727373416940
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18390192868678820880EF6E501CAEC2C3B3290FB5F663AC40AEAA22DF3F82A3D311EB45ECB00AB88CC