Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 19:43:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0856636B9E5AA903C02451F20832CFE4E02D44AE74A0807DEC445E0D899BC815
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN isn’t here to jump in and ask X users for citations. The only source mustered supports the tweet; then demands OP source with better “data”. The onus is on CN users to justify the note. If you take issue with the opinion presented take it to the replies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839019286867882088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0856636B9E5AA903C02451F20832CFE4E02D44AE74A0807DEC445E0D899BC815
  • createdAtMillis - 1727293403780
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18390192868678820880856636B9E5AA903C02451F20832CFE4E02D44AE74A0807DEC445E0D899BC815