Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 18:44:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2199134E471987B1ABD6DD7308A1D94B89A5CC28C4780E7F35F9D216F708FC8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The report is factually correct and not disputed. The use of the word “emerged” is entirely justified, as we are only now discovering the purpose of this £20,000 donation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838927803691003927
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2199134E471987B1ABD6DD7308A1D94B89A5CC28C4780E7F35F9D216F708FC8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1727289844431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18389278036910039272199134E471987B1ABD6DD7308A1D94B89A5CC28C4780E7F35F9D216F708FC8C