Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 20:52:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98E2C941D298F2C1EF1B1B00FE27F9366D4A2070E7FF218DB92E6726206E0519
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is biased by only referencing the US defamation case, not the UK case which found the statement that Depp is a “wife beater” to be “substantially true” The tweet is around real allegations having little impact on a career. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depp_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838879249668981091
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98E2C941D298F2C1EF1B1B00FE27F9366D4A2070E7FF218DB92E6726206E0519
  • createdAtMillis - 1727297550567
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183887924966898109198E2C941D298F2C1EF1B1B00FE27F9366D4A2070E7FF218DB92E6726206E0519