Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 13:29:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is biased by only referencing the US defamation case, not the UK case which found the statement that Depp is a “wife beater” to be “substantially true” The tweet is around real allegations having little impact on a career. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depp_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838879249668981091
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A
  • createdAtMillis - 1727270945062
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183887924966898109185ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A