Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 14:26:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6160FE221E5F22CE8293C0187DB1E6A130AD80577D138414D87FE9CE1EC147CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is biased by only referencing the US defamation case, not the UK case which found the statement that Depp is a “wife beater” to be “substantially true” The tweet is around real allegations having little impact on a career. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depp_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838879249668981091
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6160FE221E5F22CE8293C0187DB1E6A130AD80577D138414D87FE9CE1EC147CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1727274404637
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18388792496689810916160FE221E5F22CE8293C0187DB1E6A130AD80577D138414D87FE9CE1EC147CD