Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 15:16:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 364EFA0B5BADF34EF7B137F57CEE4ACDC1E010ED291AF8085871A9FA93CEA69E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is biased by only referencing the US defamation case, not the UK case which found the statement that Depp is a “wife beater” to be “substantially true” The tweet is around real allegations having little impact on a career. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depp_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838879249668981091
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 364EFA0B5BADF34EF7B137F57CEE4ACDC1E010ED291AF8085871A9FA93CEA69E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727277363087
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1838879249668981091364EFA0B5BADF34EF7B137F57CEE4ACDC1E010ED291AF8085871A9FA93CEA69E