Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 11:45:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9354E2657411D22345CCF547E9B787EDF8F8F163C8D035F799AB2383CA3ED4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Personal opinion based on recent developments in the case. No note needed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838858420281045096
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9354E2657411D22345CCF547E9B787EDF8F8F163C8D035F799AB2383CA3ED4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1727264702083
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1838858420281045096D9354E2657411D22345CCF547E9B787EDF8F8F163C8D035F799AB2383CA3ED4D