Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 20:53:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AD2DB85BDA07BCF52C7FBCE7EFBCFAAD8581AA6E638238D5546A109842FE4B37
Participant Details

Original Note:

while he was not proven to be innocent, it’s also important to note the main reason his case got media storm attention was due to new evidence suggesting he was not at the crime, along with confirmation the evidence was tampered with and was not allowed the investigation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838819493201444868
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AD2DB85BDA07BCF52C7FBCE7EFBCFAAD8581AA6E638238D5546A109842FE4B37
  • createdAtMillis - 1727297590876
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1838819493201444868AD2DB85BDA07BCF52C7FBCE7EFBCFAAD8581AA6E638238D5546A109842FE4B37