Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 19:12:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB28BF6DF13B6EE2E7A61F52471CB310BF54AD48D793A9C930CC0E7EE1183F67
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article linked makes it clear that the South Carolina “abortion ban” took effect after this incident. It also includes the following. It also quotes the Democratic solicitor involved with the case as saying the case “had nothing to do with” the ban. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/09/23/health/south-carolina-abortion-kff-health-news-partner

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838773534782361761
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB28BF6DF13B6EE2E7A61F52471CB310BF54AD48D793A9C930CC0E7EE1183F67
  • createdAtMillis - 1727291535226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1838773534782361761EB28BF6DF13B6EE2E7A61F52471CB310BF54AD48D793A9C930CC0E7EE1183F67