Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 20:55:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73B924FF9B8F868512BF3181572D57C2122D924CE3C67946650BC6919852E455
Participant Details

Original Note:

La même Sandrine Rousseau n'avait aucun problème pour faire de la récupération concernant l'affaire de Mazam et à en tirer des conclusions globales sur la société. Visiblement, la récupération est autorisée dans certaines affaires et pas dans d'autres. https://x.com/sandrousseau/status/1836327720097075340

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1838673616986059157
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 73B924FF9B8F868512BF3181572D57C2122D924CE3C67946650BC6919852E455
createdAtMillis - 1727211334241
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 183867361698605915773B924FF9B8F868512BF3181572D57C2122D924CE3C67946650BC6919852E455