Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 20:40:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D424ED57C0553F54F73683C89A75AF0D44FBAFE9E4F608000C5AFFC9E76C2A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wichtiger Kontext: Alle Kernbehauptungen von Correctivs Recherche sind bisher vor Gericht nur bestÃĪtigt worden. https://correctiv.org/in-eigener-sache/2024/08/30/correctiv-erfolge-vor-gericht/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838647672112034186
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D424ED57C0553F54F73683C89A75AF0D44FBAFE9E4F608000C5AFFC9E76C2A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1727296836246
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18386476721120341860D424ED57C0553F54F73683C89A75AF0D44FBAFE9E4F608000C5AFFC9E76C2A9