Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 08:59:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9AB433C2C8725D3302133EA7AA900FF40885464773BE737426FEA908F0657CBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- L'article cité date de 2018, et porte sur l'enrichissement personnel et la surfacturation, qui ne sont plus en question. "Elle se réjouit que les motifs de la convocation devant les juges ont exclu la surfacturation, l’enrichissement personnel et le travail de bénévoles" https://lafranceinsoumise.fr/2024/09/24/mise-en-examen-de-sophia-chikirou-la-france-insoumise-denonce-un-acharnement-judiciaire-et-mediatique-insupportable/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838643246882533684
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9AB433C2C8725D3302133EA7AA900FF40885464773BE737426FEA908F0657CBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1727254752254
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18386432468825336849AB433C2C8725D3302133EA7AA900FF40885464773BE737426FEA908F0657CBF