Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 18:22:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88AF8181A6266FEE2948394212CA2C715048857781EB3936352B36F05147E9EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- L'article cité date de 2018, et porte sur l'enrichissement personnel et la surfacturation, qui ne sont plus en question. "Elle se réjouit que les motifs de la convocation devant les juges ont exclu la surfacturation, l’enrichissement personnel et le travail de bénévoles" https://lafranceinsoumise.fr/2024/09/24/mise-en-examen-de-sophia-chikirou-la-france-insoumise-denonce-un-acharnement-judiciaire-et-mediatique-insupportable/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838643246882533684
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 88AF8181A6266FEE2948394212CA2C715048857781EB3936352B36F05147E9EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1727202126276
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183864324688253368488AF8181A6266FEE2948394212CA2C715048857781EB3936352B36F05147E9EF