Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 14:04:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2838957E969B10C30828C353FC7FA55423E463E2FD44E8F5098FE6268A5D534
Participant Details

Original Note:

While having public opinion is appreciated, this is an abuse of creating multiple accounts to express personal dislikes with the intention to harm, which can lead to negative consequences and undesirable ethical concerns for the community and spark unnecessary arguments. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/deliberation-and-ethical-voting-behavior-evidence-from-a-campaign-experiment-in-benin/CF658CC20ED7F610AFD5AB43E9334E7C

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838580299695034737
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2838957E969B10C30828C353FC7FA55423E463E2FD44E8F5098FE6268A5D534
  • createdAtMillis - 1727273091465
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1838580299695034737C2838957E969B10C30828C353FC7FA55423E463E2FD44E8F5098FE6268A5D534